Uchiha Sasuke illustration, Sasuke Uchiha Itachi Uchiha Madara Uchiha Gaara Naruto Uzumaki, Uchiha Sasuke, black Hair, cartoons, cartoon png 1024x1843px 813.79KB.Anime Girl Chibi, Anime Girl, blue-haired girl illustration, black Hair, cartoons, cartoon png 500x700px 295.05KB.The Idolmaster Cinderella Girls Anime Manga Art, anastasia, face, cg Artwork, black Hair png 1600x3963px 2.1MB.girl carrying handbag illustration, Drawing Art, Graffiti Girl, comics, child, painted png 481x1000px 223.63KB.Dead by Daylight Michael Myers Fan art, fan, technic, chibi, video Game png 600x900px 304.25KB.Anime Drawing Manga, anime girl, cg Artwork, black Hair, cartoon png 768x1039px 464.59KB.
female anime illustration, Sakura Haruno Sasuke Uchiha Kakashi Hatake Naruto Uzumaki Itachi Uchiha, Naruto Shippuden Background, human, cartoons, fictional Character png 1024x2433px 733.54KB.female anime character, Anime Drawing Chibi Kavaii Manga, cute little girl, white, child, face png 2967x7333px 1.38MB.I argue that this is correct, but that the axiological commitments Deleuze manifests in his account of nature are ultimately quite different from those to which deep ecologists appear sympathetic. Deleuze is much touted by environmental philosophers as contributing to (c). So that if deep ecology is to avoid (a), it must embrace (c). My reconstruction of the Ideologiekritiker shows them belonging to (b). I then outline three possible relations of axiological to metaphysical commitments: (a) the abandonment of naturalism about values (b) a projective or transcendentally idealist account of values (c) an account of values as themselves lodged within the operation of natural systems. But both these thinkers simultaneously demonstrate a hostility to metaphysical naturalism and therefore have ultimately limited value for deep ecology.
I give the examples of Heidegger and Adorno to show how deeply our understanding of nature has been corrupted, and hence the depth of conceptual transformation required correctly to conceive nature. Although (3) is sometimes cast in personal or psychological terms, I think the idea can be given a properly philosophical reconstruction along the lines of a kind of Ideologiekritik. I argue that 'deep' ecology (as exemplified by the work of Arnie Naess) involves three inter-related commitments: (1) to an ethics of nature or axiological anti-humanism in which natural entities, processes or systems can possess intrinsic value independently of human beings (2) a metaphysical naturalism or anti-humanism in which human beings are themselves conceptualized as natural products (3) a transformative aspect.
0 kommentar(er)
